A bitter High Court dispute has broken out involving possible neighbours above the development of the wall in a coastal web site inside of a north Dublin suburb, a case that has attracted nationwide attention subsequent an Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres with a proposed loved ones property at Sutton Strand, where by allegations of preparing breaches, environmental worries, and very long-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled into your courts. The Irish Times post about René Collier as well as the Irish Moments short article about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what commenced as a neighborhood disagreement has advanced into a very publicised legal battle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing more than construction functions at the website on Dublin Road, Sutton, where Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a health care provider and a corporation director respectively, request to develop their relatives household. The case is now emblematic of broader disputes alongside Ireland’s coastline, where by enhancement pressures collide with environmental protections plus the sensitivities of proven residents. In accordance with the Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall getting built by their future neighbours goes over and above the boundaries permitted under scheduling permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both inhabitants of Dublin Road, assert that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the terms in their preparing authorization by building a wall outside of the boundaries of their internet site, leading to an encroachment on the Special Spot of Conservation. The SAC designation is central to the dispute, as a result areas are matter to demanding controls below European and Irish environmental regulation. In their court filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even minimal encroachments might have lasting ecological repercussions, particularly within a delicate coastal ecosystem including Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny These are in breach in their organizing authorization, and say the wall, that's partially created, is in the proper position. Their legal crew has characterised the action as an try and delay or frustrate a lawful progress. The pair accuse litigants of trying to get to halt homebuilding as a way to preserve their check out, an allegation that's been repeated in court and referenced in coverage of the situation. This accusation goes to the guts of numerous coastal setting up disputes, where by sights of the sea are equally hugely prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described dramatic efforts by the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded as a result of ocean in storm to photograph the internet site, In keeping with sworn proof referenced while in the Irish Instances. In one account, Rene Collier waded through midsection-significant drinking water in the course of a storm to photograph the website Irish Times, a picture that has considering the fact that develop into emblematic on the intensity of your dispute. These actions weren't just symbolic; they had been meant to Obtain Visible evidence of your wall’s placement relative to tidal strains and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site with the sea Irish Occasions claimed, describing how the two Adult men entered the drinking water in the course of severe weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading through storm drinking water to photograph the internet site became One of the more hanging descriptions to emerge from court docket reporting. The Irish Occasions report about accountant Paul Feely pointed out that this sort of steps were being cited to show the plaintiffs’ belief the wall prolonged into a region afflicted by tidal movement, strengthening their argument that the SAC was currently being encroached upon.
The gatherings at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 had been included in detail via the nationwide push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Occasions 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Periods January 27 2026 turned widely searched phrases as readers sought to comprehend the qualifications and implications of the case. On that date, the High Court heard more submissions on no matter if interim orders need to be granted to halt design pending an entire Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a essential minute while in the authorized timeline.
On the core from the dispute is really a disagreement more than boundaries, preparing compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely maintain which the wall, as produced, goes outside of what was accredited and intrudes into safeguarded land. They argue that this isn't a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by profession, has long been called meticulous in his evaluation of planning files, maps, and problems attached into the permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both pressured that their action is determined by problem for environmental security and adherence to arranging law. They reject statements that the case is about preserving A non-public view, insisting in its place that it is about ensuring that progress at Sutton Strand respects legal and ecological restrictions. In affidavits, they've explained their extended-standing relationship to the area and their recognition of its environmental sensitivity.
On the other aspect, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed them selves as a couple only attempting to produce a family members property in accordance with the legislation. They deny the wall Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely encroaches with a Unique Spot of Conservation and say that every one works have already been performed based on Skilled tips and authorised ideas. Their lawyers have argued that the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and that the remarkable actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, which includes getting into the sea for the duration of a storm, never alter the fundamental info.
The situation has also elevated broader questions about how organizing disputes are settled in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court dispute more than construction of wall at coastal website has become a shorthand description to get a scenario that many observers see as increasingly common. As sea concentrations increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the exact delineation in between private land, general public foreshore, and protected habitats is starting to become much more contentious.
The Irish Times posting about René Collier observed that the businessman experienced Earlier been associated with nearby advocacy on scheduling and environmental difficulties, however not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Periods write-up about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how individuals from incredibly distinct professional backgrounds can find them selves aligned in these kinds of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some reports spell their names, became synonymous With all the Sutton Strand circumstance.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the website within the sea Irish Instances protection emphasised, underlining The weird lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded by means of midsection-high drinking water all through a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Situations and René Collier waded via waistline-superior water for the duration of a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Occasions are phrases that appeared continuously in protection, reflecting both equally the Actual physical reality on the coastline plus the symbolic mother nature of the act. For supporters from the plaintiffs, these actions demonstrated dedication; for critics, they illustrated the things they see as an extreme technique.
As being the High Court proceedings go on, the result continues to be unsure. The courtroom ought to identify whether or not the wall as crafted complies with scheduling authorization and whether any encroachment right into a Distinctive Space of Conservation has happened. The legal arguments are intricate, involving interpretation of maps, tidal details, and setting up ailments. But the human factor stays central: neighbours who need to live together with each other lengthy after the lawful costs have been paid out.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing in excess of development functions at the website on Dublin Road, Sutton, however the implications of the case lengthen beyond that tackle. For planners, developers, and citizens alike, the dispute serves as a reminder of the importance of clarity in organizing permissions and sensitivity in coastal advancement. What's more, it underscores how rapidly an area disagreement can escalate when fundamental difficulties such as environmental defense and house rights are perceived to generally be at stake.
Meanwhile, Sutton Strand remains an area of normal attractiveness and contested boundaries. The wall for the centre with the dispute stands partially constructed, a Actual physical manifestation of unresolved authorized inquiries. Irrespective of whether it will eventually in the long run be altered, taken out, or completed as planned will count on the court’s conclusions. Until finally then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variants will probably go on to appear in headlines, connected indelibly to One of the more intently viewed planning disputes in north Dublin in recent years.